Friday, February 10, 2012

THE RESULTS ARE IN


As of 4:04pm yesterday, you guys were 42.8% Nay/37.1% YAY! on the Chie Miharas for our minimalist bride.

An even 20% of you said Just get some damn flats already, and to you I say: ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.


Pls do not ask me about the math. Take it up with Wufoo.
Posted by esb at 6:00 AM
Labels: , ,

17 comments:

  1. AnonymousFebruary 10, 2012 at 8:40 AM

    The first thing that I noticed was that the math was off. Good call on the disclaimer. ESB anticipates.

    ReplyDelete
  2. RobFebruary 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM

    You naysayers will regret your vote in time. These shoes are kick ass.

    You flat voters already regret your vote.

    ReplyDelete
  3. nicoleFebruary 10, 2012 at 9:13 AM

    The only vote that matters is Rob's! (It shoulda counted twice, at least.)

    Did minimalist bride ever weigh in?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. RobFebruary 10, 2012 at 12:02 PM

      I did vote twice and I tried to vote more than that. However, someone made cheating too difficult.

      Delete
  4. 17 beats.February 10, 2012 at 9:52 AM

    the math isn't off. many fractions are non-terminating in decimal form, and it looks like Wufoo only takes things to a tenth, which requires rounding, which of course, and give things the illusion of being 'off'.

    excuse me while i go tape my glasses back together.

    (i'm still not sure about these shoes, btw)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 17 beats.February 10, 2012 at 9:53 AM

      in fact, they may not of rounded, they may have truncated. either way, it messes with the precision.

      Delete
    2. nikkiFebruary 10, 2012 at 11:53 AM

      I LOVE THIS COMMENT

      Delete
  5. mandalizabethFebruary 10, 2012 at 12:24 PM

    I hated them on their own, but with feet they're kinda swell.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MegatronFebruary 10, 2012 at 12:35 PM

      I definitely like them better with feet, but that chunky heel + that bone color = '92. Sorry, Rob.

      Delete
    2. esbFebruary 10, 2012 at 12:51 PM

      WHAT IS WRONG WITH 92??

      Delete
    3. kathleen // scout + lillyFebruary 10, 2012 at 5:16 PM

      I would say they're more along the lines of early Sex and the City - like, early 2000s. I think Charlotte wore some shoes almost exactly like that in the foot fetish episode.

      (Kill me now for knowing that. Kthanxbye.)

      Delete
  6. nicoleFebruary 10, 2012 at 1:20 PM

    If I've learned anything on ESB, it's use organic lube; don't use glitter; rock your caftan; dress your boobs; trust the Rob; and, um, choose 3.1 Phillip Lim if you're a minimalist bride. 3.1 Phillip Lim SS12: Look at their feet. 2012 is 1992.

    ReplyDelete
  7. MegatronFebruary 10, 2012 at 5:21 PM

    Im fashion challenged and I was in kindergarten in '92...what do I know? For what it's worth, they look ah-mazing from the front view, but still...that heel. I just can't.

    ReplyDelete
  8. AmandaFebruary 13, 2012 at 4:43 AM

    What is the SAMPLE SIZE of this survey?

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)